Credentialing · head-to-head
CredentialStream vs Five Lakes Professional Services
Verdict. CredentialStream leads on the overall Data Index (6.1 vs 4.8). On the 3 axes where both have evidence, CredentialStream wins 3, Five Lakes Professional Services wins 0. Clearest gaps: support (CredentialStream 8.0 vs 6.0), vendor stability (CredentialStream 8.0 vs 6.5), and pricing clarity (CredentialStream 3.0 vs 2.0).
CredentialStreamFive Lakes Professional Services
Table view
| Axis | CredentialStream | Five Lakes Professional Services |
|---|---|---|
| Features | no data | no data |
| Integrations | no data | no data |
| Pricing clarity | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Support | 8.0 | 6.0 |
| Vendor stability | 8.0 | 6.5 |
| User rating | 7.8 | no data |
Axis by axis
- Features – vs – no data
- Integrations – vs – no data
- Pricing clarity 3.0 vs 2.0 CredentialStream
- Support 8.0 vs 6.0 CredentialStream
- Vendor stability 8.0 vs 6.5 CredentialStream
- User rating 7.8 vs – no data
Side by side
| CredentialStream | Five Lakes Professional Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Data Index | 6.1 | 4.8 |
| Category rank | #2 of 7 · Credentialing | #4 of 7 · Credentialing |
| User rating | 3.9 / 5 | — |
| Review count | 208 | — |
| Pricing transparency | Quote only | Quote only |
| License | Quote only | Quote only |
| Deployment | Cloud | Managed service |
| HIPAA claim | Yes | — |
| Free trial | 30 days | — |
| In market since | — | 2010 |
| Company size | 501-1000 | 11-50 |
| Markets | US | US |
| Data completeness | 100% | 91% |
Choose Five Lakes Professional Services if…
- Dental practices, groups, and DSOs needing comprehensive credentialing and PPO management services.
FAQ
Is CredentialStream better than Five Lakes Professional Services?
CredentialStream leads on the overall Data Index (6.1 vs 4.8). On the 3 axes where both have evidence, CredentialStream wins 3, Five Lakes Professional Services wins 0. Clearest gaps: support (CredentialStream 8.0 vs 6.0), vendor stability (CredentialStream 8.0 vs 6.5), and pricing clarity (CredentialStream 3.0 vs 2.0).