Ortho planning · head-to-head
Dolphin Imaging vs OnyxCeph3
Verdict. OnyxCeph3 leads on the overall Data Index (6.1 vs 5.8). On the 3 axes where both have evidence, Dolphin Imaging wins 0, OnyxCeph3 wins 2 and 1 is tied. Clearest gaps: features (OnyxCeph3 8.6 vs 4.3) and pricing clarity (OnyxCeph3 5.0 vs 2.0).
Dolphin ImagingOnyxCeph3
Table view
| Axis | Dolphin Imaging | OnyxCeph3 |
|---|---|---|
| Features | 4.3 | 8.6 |
| Integrations | 7.3 | no data |
| Pricing clarity | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| Support | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Vendor stability | 9.0 | no data |
| User rating | 7.8 | no data |
Axis by axis
- Features 4.3 vs 8.6 OnyxCeph3
- Integrations 7.3 vs – no data
- Pricing clarity 2.0 vs 5.0 OnyxCeph3
- Support 4.0 vs 4.0 tie
- Vendor stability 9.0 vs – no data
- User rating 7.8 vs – no data
Side by side
| Dolphin Imaging | OnyxCeph3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Data Index | 5.8 | 6.1 |
| Category rank | #3 of 12 · Ortho planning | #2 of 12 · Ortho planning |
| User rating | 3.9 / 5 | — |
| Review count | 27 | — |
| Pricing transparency | Quote only | Partially public |
| License | Quote only | Subscription |
| Deployment | Cloud | Desktop |
| HIPAA claim | Yes | — |
| Company size | 3,367 | — |
| Markets | US, CA | global |
| Data completeness | 78% | 83% |
Features
3 of 6 tracked capabilities differ. Only OnyxCeph3: aligner staging, in-house aligner export, and indirect bonding.
| Capability | Dolphin Imaging | OnyxCeph3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cephalometrics | ✓ | ✓ |
| CBCT / 3D | ✓ | ✓ |
| Aligner staging | ? | ✓ |
| In-house aligner export | ? | ✓ |
| Indirect bonding | ? | ✓ |
| Patient simulation | ✓ | ✓ |
Choose OnyxCeph3 if…
- you need aligner staging
- you need in-house aligner export
FAQ
Is Dolphin Imaging better than OnyxCeph3?
OnyxCeph3 leads on the overall Data Index (6.1 vs 5.8). On the 3 axes where both have evidence, Dolphin Imaging wins 0, OnyxCeph3 wins 2 and 1 is tied. Clearest gaps: features (OnyxCeph3 8.6 vs 4.3) and pricing clarity (OnyxCeph3 5.0 vs 2.0).