ClearCorrect vs OrthoFX
Verdict. OrthoFX leads on the overall Data Index (4.9 vs 4.6). On the 4 axes where both have evidence, ClearCorrect wins 1, OrthoFX wins 1 and 2 are tied. Clearest gaps: integrations (OrthoFX 6.5 vs 2.3) and features (ClearCorrect 7.1 vs 4.3).
Table view
| Axis | ClearCorrect | OrthoFX |
|---|---|---|
| Features | 7.1 | 4.3 |
| Integrations | 2.3 | 6.5 |
| Pricing clarity | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Support | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Vendor stability | no data | 6.0 |
| User rating | no data | no data |
Axis by axis
- Features 7.1 vs 4.3 ClearCorrect
- Integrations 2.3 vs 6.5 OrthoFX
- Pricing clarity 2.0 vs 2.0 tie
- Support 6.0 vs 6.0 tie
- Vendor stability – vs 6.0 no data
- User rating – vs – no data
What our reviews say
ClearCorrect
Straumann's clear aligner system: a tri-layer ClearQuartz material, a high flat trimline, scans accepted from any scanner as STL, and no setup fees. A credible alternative to Invisalign, but doctor fees are behind the provider login.
Strengths- Accepts STL files from any intraoral scanner
- No setup fees, according to ClearCorrect
- ClearQuartz tri-layer material and a high, flat trimline designed for retention and force control
- Current doctor pricing is not public; the support centre requires a login
- Smaller patient brand recognition than Invisalign
- Performance claims for the material are the vendor's own data on file
Side by side
| ClearCorrect | OrthoFX | |
|---|---|---|
| Data Index | 4.6 | 4.9 |
| Category rank | #4 of 6 · Aligner systems | #3 of 6 · Aligner systems |
| Pricing transparency | Quote only | Quote only |
| License | Quote only | Quote only |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Mobile app |
| HIPAA claim | Yes | — |
| Company size | — | 51–200 |
| Markets | US, CA, UK, AU, NZ, EU, MENA | US |
| Data completeness | 93% | 86% |
Features
2 of 5 tracked capabilities differ. Only ClearCorrect: cephalometrics and cbct / 3d.
| Capability | ClearCorrect | OrthoFX |
|---|---|---|
| Cephalometrics | ✓ | ? |
| CBCT / 3D | ✓ | ? |
| Aligner staging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Patient simulation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Remote monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
Choose ClearCorrect if…
- Practices that want to submit scans from any intraoral scanner
- Offices already working with Straumann for implants and other products
- Providers who want an aligner brand without volume tiers deciding the price
- you need cephalometrics
- you need cbct / 3d
FAQ
Is ClearCorrect better than OrthoFX?
OrthoFX leads on the overall Data Index (4.9 vs 4.6). On the 4 axes where both have evidence, ClearCorrect wins 1, OrthoFX wins 1 and 2 are tied. Clearest gaps: integrations (OrthoFX 6.5 vs 2.3) and features (ClearCorrect 7.1 vs 4.3).