denture·id
Implant planning · head-to-head

RealGUIDE vs Simplant

Verdict. Simplant leads on the overall Data Index (6.4 vs 6.2). On the 4 axes where both have evidence, RealGUIDE wins 3, Simplant wins 1. Clearest gaps: vendor stability (Simplant 10.0 vs 4.5), features (RealGUIDE 10.0 vs 7.1), and support (RealGUIDE 6.0 vs 4.0).

510 Features 10.0 · 7.1 Integrations – · – Pricing clarity 3.0 · 2.0 Support 6.0 · 4.0 Vendor stability 4.5 · 10.0 User rating – · 8.6
RealGUIDESimplant
Table view
AxisRealGUIDESimplant
Features 10.07.1
Integrations no datano data
Pricing clarity 3.02.0
Support 6.04.0
Vendor stability 4.510.0
User rating no data8.6

Axis by axis

  • Features 10.0 vs 7.1 RealGUIDE
  • Integrations – vs – no data
  • Pricing clarity 3.0 vs 2.0 RealGUIDE
  • Support 6.0 vs 4.0 RealGUIDE
  • Vendor stability 4.5 vs 10.0 Simplant
  • User rating – vs 8.6 no data

Side by side

RealGUIDESimplant
Data Index 6.2 6.4
Category rank #4 of 12 · Implant planning #3 of 12 · Implant planning
User rating — 4.3 / 5
Review count — 3
Pricing transparency Quote only Quote only
License Quote only Quote only
Deployment Desktop, Mobile app Desktop
HIPAA claim — Yes
Free trial 30 days —
Company size 24 10001+
Markets US, AU, NZ US
Data completeness 81% 76%

Features

2 of 7 tracked capabilities differ. Only RealGUIDE: guide stl export and auto nerve tracing.

CapabilityRealGUIDESimplant
DICOM import✓✓
Open implant library✓✓
Guide design✓✓
Guide STL export✓?
Auto nerve tracing✓?
Prosthetic-driven✓✓
Full arch✓✓

Choose RealGUIDE if…

  • you need guide stl export
  • you need auto nerve tracing
Full RealGUIDE profile →

Choose Simplant if…

    Full Simplant profile →

    FAQ

    Is RealGUIDE better than Simplant?

    Simplant leads on the overall Data Index (6.4 vs 6.2). On the 4 axes where both have evidence, RealGUIDE wins 3, Simplant wins 1. Clearest gaps: vendor stability (Simplant 10.0 vs 4.5), features (RealGUIDE 10.0 vs 7.1), and support (RealGUIDE 6.0 vs 4.0).

    Related comparisons

    See the full implant planning ranking →