Implant planning · head-to-head
coDiagnostiX vs RealGUIDE
Verdict. coDiagnostiX leads on the overall Data Index (7.3 vs 6.2). On the 3 axes where both have evidence, coDiagnostiX wins 1, RealGUIDE wins 1 and 1 is tied. Clearest gaps: pricing clarity (coDiagnostiX 10.0 vs 3.0) and features (RealGUIDE 10.0 vs 8.6).
coDiagnostiXRealGUIDE
Table view
| Axis | coDiagnostiX | RealGUIDE |
|---|---|---|
| Features | 8.6 | 10.0 |
| Integrations | 3.6 | no data |
| Pricing clarity | 10.0 | 3.0 |
| Support | 6.3 | 6.0 |
| Vendor stability | no data | 4.5 |
| User rating | 9.0 | no data |
Axis by axis
- Features 8.6 vs 10.0 RealGUIDE
- Integrations 3.6 vs – no data
- Pricing clarity 10.0 vs 3.0 coDiagnostiX
- Support 6.3 vs 6.0 tie
- Vendor stability – vs 4.5 no data
- User rating 9.0 vs – no data
Side by side
| coDiagnostiX | RealGUIDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Data Index | 7.3 | 6.2 |
| Category rank | #1 of 12 · Implant planning | #4 of 12 · Implant planning |
| User rating | 4.5 / 5 | — |
| Review count | 1 | — |
| Starting price | $0/mo | — |
| Pricing transparency | Full public pricing | Quote only |
| License | Subscription | Quote only |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop, Mobile app |
| Free trial | 30 days | 30 days |
| Company size | — | 24 |
| Markets | AU, CA, EU, UK, LATAM, APAC | US, AU, NZ |
| Data completeness | 76% | 81% |
Features
1 of 7 tracked capabilities differ. Only RealGUIDE: full arch.
| Capability | coDiagnostiX | RealGUIDE |
|---|---|---|
| DICOM import | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open implant library | ✓ | ✓ |
| Guide design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Guide STL export | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auto nerve tracing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prosthetic-driven | ✓ | ✓ |
| Full arch | ? | ✓ |
FAQ
Is coDiagnostiX better than RealGUIDE?
coDiagnostiX leads on the overall Data Index (7.3 vs 6.2). On the 3 axes where both have evidence, coDiagnostiX wins 1, RealGUIDE wins 1 and 1 is tied. Clearest gaps: pricing clarity (coDiagnostiX 10.0 vs 3.0) and features (RealGUIDE 10.0 vs 8.6).