Intraoral scanners · head-to-head
TRIOS 5 vs TRIOS 6
Verdict. TRIOS 6 leads on the overall Data Index (8.2 vs 7.7). On the 4 axes where both have evidence, TRIOS 5 wins 0, TRIOS 6 wins 1 and 3 are tied. Clearest gaps: spec disclosure (TRIOS 6 8.3 vs 5.0).
TRIOS 5TRIOS 6
Table view
| Axis | TRIOS 5 | TRIOS 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Openness | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Regulatory | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Price clarity | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Spec disclosure | 5.0 | 8.3 |
| Accuracy evidence | no data | no data |
Axis by axis
- Openness 10.0 vs 10.0 tie
- Regulatory 6.0 vs 6.0 tie
- Price clarity 9.0 vs 9.0 tie
- Spec disclosure 5.0 vs 8.3 TRIOS 6
- Accuracy evidence – vs – no data
Side by side
| TRIOS 5 | TRIOS 6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Data Index | 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Category rank | #2 of 20 · Intraoral scanners | #1 of 20 · Intraoral scanners |
| List price | $25,900 | $27,900 |
| Pricing transparency | Public starting price | Public starting price |
| Subscription required | No | No |
| Open export | Yes | Yes |
| Type | Intraoral scanner | Intraoral scanner |
| In market since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Markets | US | EU |
| Data completeness | 91% | 100% |
FAQ
Is TRIOS 5 better than TRIOS 6?
TRIOS 6 leads on the overall Data Index (8.2 vs 7.7). On the 4 axes where both have evidence, TRIOS 5 wins 0, TRIOS 6 wins 1 and 3 are tied. Clearest gaps: spec disclosure (TRIOS 6 8.3 vs 5.0).