denture·id
Dental CAM · head-to-head

DentalCAM vs iCAM V5

Verdict. iCAM V5 leads on the overall Data Index (5.9 vs 5.7). On the 3 axes where both have evidence, DentalCAM wins 0, iCAM V5 wins 1 and 2 are tied. Clearest gaps: features (iCAM V5 8.2 vs 6.4).

510 Features 6.4 · 8.2 Integrations – · 3.6 Pricing clarity 5.0 · 5.0 Support 4.0 · – Vendor stability 7.0 · 7.0 User rating – · –
DentalCAMiCAM V5
Table view
AxisDentalCAMiCAM V5
Features 6.48.2
Integrations no data3.6
Pricing clarity 5.05.0
Support 4.0no data
Vendor stability 7.07.0
User rating no datano data

Axis by axis

  • Features 6.4 vs 8.2 iCAM V5
  • Integrations – vs 3.6 no data
  • Pricing clarity 5.0 vs 5.0 tie
  • Support 4.0 vs – no data
  • Vendor stability 7.0 vs 7.0 tie
  • User rating – vs – no data

Side by side

DentalCAMiCAM V5
Data Index 5.7 5.9
Category rank #4 of 10 · Dental CAM #2 of 10 · Dental CAM
Starting price $49/mo —
Pricing transparency Partially public Partially public
License Subscription Perpetual
Deployment Desktop, Bundled with hardware —
Verified integrations — 2
Company size 300-350 around 250
Markets global, US, CA US
Data completeness 71% 76%

Features

4 of 11 tracked capabilities differ. Only DentalCAM: 4-axis. Only iCAM V5: tool library, pmma, and peek.

CapabilityDentalCAMiCAM V5
3-axis✕✕
4-axis✓✕
5-axis✓✓
Auto nesting✓✓
Tool library?✓
Zirconia✓✓
PMMA✕✓
Glass ceramic✓✓
Titanium✓✓
CoCr✓✓
PEEK✕✓

Integrations

Only DentalCAM · 0

Both · 0

Only iCAM V5 · 2

Choose DentalCAM if…

  • you need 4-axis
Full DentalCAM profile →

Choose iCAM V5 if…

  • you need tool library
  • you need pmma
Full iCAM V5 profile →

FAQ

Is DentalCAM better than iCAM V5?

iCAM V5 leads on the overall Data Index (5.9 vs 5.7). On the 3 axes where both have evidence, DentalCAM wins 0, iCAM V5 wins 1 and 2 are tied. Clearest gaps: features (iCAM V5 8.2 vs 6.4).

Do DentalCAM and iCAM V5 integrate with the same systems?

They share 0 verified integrations. Only DentalCAM lists 0; only iCAM V5 lists 2.

Related comparisons

See the full dental CAM ranking →