Dental CAM · head-to-head
iCAM V5 vs WorkNC Dental
Verdict. WorkNC Dental leads on the overall Data Index (6.2 vs 5.9). On the 2 axes where both have evidence, iCAM V5 wins 1, WorkNC Dental wins 1. Clearest gaps: pricing clarity (iCAM V5 5.0 vs 2.0) and features (WorkNC Dental 10.0 vs 8.2).
iCAM V5WorkNC Dental
Table view
| Axis | iCAM V5 | WorkNC Dental |
|---|---|---|
| Features | 8.2 | 10.0 |
| Integrations | 3.6 | no data |
| Pricing clarity | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| Support | no data | 6.0 |
| Vendor stability | 7.0 | no data |
| User rating | no data | no data |
Axis by axis
- Features 8.2 vs 10.0 WorkNC Dental
- Integrations 3.6 vs – no data
- Pricing clarity 5.0 vs 2.0 iCAM V5
- Support – vs 6.0 no data
- Vendor stability 7.0 vs – no data
- User rating – vs – no data
Side by side
| iCAM V5 | WorkNC Dental | |
|---|---|---|
| Data Index | 5.9 | 6.2 |
| Category rank | #2 of 10 · Dental CAM | #1 of 10 · Dental CAM |
| Pricing transparency | Partially public | Quote only |
| License | Perpetual | Quote only |
| Deployment | — | Desktop |
| Verified integrations | 2 | — |
| Company size | around 250 | — |
| Markets | US | APAC |
| Data completeness | 76% | 71% |
Features
2 of 11 tracked capabilities differ. Only WorkNC Dental: 3-axis and 4-axis.
| Capability | iCAM V5 | WorkNC Dental |
|---|---|---|
| 3-axis | ✕ | ✓ |
| 4-axis | ✕ | ✓ |
| 5-axis | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auto nesting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool library | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zirconia | ✓ | ✓ |
| PMMA | ✓ | ✓ |
| Glass ceramic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Titanium | ✓ | ✓ |
| CoCr | ✓ | ✓ |
| PEEK | ✓ | ✓ |
Integrations
FAQ
Is iCAM V5 better than WorkNC Dental?
WorkNC Dental leads on the overall Data Index (6.2 vs 5.9). On the 2 axes where both have evidence, iCAM V5 wins 1, WorkNC Dental wins 1. Clearest gaps: pricing clarity (iCAM V5 5.0 vs 2.0) and features (WorkNC Dental 10.0 vs 8.2).
Do iCAM V5 and WorkNC Dental integrate with the same systems?
They share 0 verified integrations. Only iCAM V5 lists 2; only WorkNC Dental lists 0.