Pearl Second Opinion vs Overjet
Verdict. Pearl Second Opinion leads on the overall Data Index (6.9 vs 6.2). On the 5 axes where both have evidence, Pearl Second Opinion wins 1, Overjet wins 2 and 2 are tied. Clearest gaps: integrations (Pearl Second Opinion 7.6 vs 2.3), pricing clarity (Overjet 7.0 vs 2.0), and features (Overjet 9.2 vs 8.5).
Table view
| Axis | Pearl Second Opinion | Overjet |
|---|---|---|
| Features | 8.5 | 9.2 |
| Integrations | 7.6 | 2.3 |
| Pricing clarity | 2.0 | 7.0 |
| Support | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Vendor stability | 8.0 | 7.7 |
| User rating | 8.8 | no data |
Axis by axis
- Features 8.5 vs 9.2 Overjet
- Integrations 7.6 vs 2.3 Pearl Second Opinion
- Pricing clarity 2.0 vs 7.0 Overjet
- Support 4.0 vs 4.0 tie
- Vendor stability 8.0 vs 7.7 tie
- User rating 8.8 vs – no data
Pearl Second Opinion or Overjet: which should you choose?
These are the two best-known dental X-ray AI products, and both hold several FDA 510(k) clearances. The difference is who they are built for.
Pearl Second Opinion is the more accessible choice for a single practice. It works inside more than 40 imaging and practice management systems by the vendor's count, and its Capterra listing gives a flat $299 a month with a free trial. The clearances we read cover permanent teeth in patients from age 12 or 19, depending on the finding. Reviewers find it helpful but report false positives, especially for interproximal decay.
Overjet is aimed at DSOs and insurers. Its DSO sales page lists Vision AI at $595 per location per month plus a $1,500 implementation fee. It adds measured findings on the image, CBCT analysis, its own imaging software, voice notes and insurance verification and claims tools. Public user reviews are almost nonexistent.
A solo or small practice should start with a Pearl trial. A group that wants consistent reads across offices tied to insurance workflows should pilot Overjet. With either, ask which findings are cleared for which image types and ages, and treat the AI as a second reader.
Reviewed under the standards of our Editorial Board
What our reviews say
Pearl Second Opinion
Chairside X-ray AI with FDA clearances for caries and periapical findings and 40+ imaging integrations. The most accessible option for a single practice.
Strengths- FDA 510(k) clearances we verified for caries detection and periapical radiolucency
- Integrates with more than 40 imaging and practice management systems, by the vendor's count
- Detects up to 18 types of finding, including measured bone loss
- Reviewers report false positives, especially interproximal decay and cervical burnout
- Clearances are limited by image type and patient age
- Only a handful of public user reviews
Overjet
FDA-cleared dental X-ray AI that has grown into imaging, voice notes and insurance tools. Built with DSOs and payers in mind; list prices per location are published on a sales page, and public reviews are few.
Strengths- Multiple FDA 510(k) clearances, from caries detection in 2022 to CBCT analysis in 2025
- Measures and outlines findings on the image, which helps patient communication
- Broader platform: imaging software, ambient voice notes, verification and claims tools
- List price of $595 a month per location for Vision AI, plus a $1,500 implementation fee
- Almost no public user reviews
- Each clearance covers specific findings, image types and ages, not everything the product shows
Side by side
| Pearl Second Opinion | Overjet | |
|---|---|---|
| Data Index | 6.9 | 6.2 |
| Category rank | #1 of 14 · AI radiograph analysis | #2 of 14 · AI radiograph analysis |
| User rating | 4.4 / 5 | — |
| Review count | 13 | — |
| Starting price | — | $595/mo |
| Pricing transparency | Quote only | Public starting price |
| License | Quote only | Subscription |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Verified integrations | 9 | — |
| HIPAA claim | Yes | Yes |
| In market since | — | 2018 |
| Company size | 501-1000 | 51-200 |
| Funding | — | $159M |
| Markets | global | US |
| Data completeness | 100% | 88% |
Features
1 of 13 tracked capabilities differ. Only Overjet: segmentation.
| Capability | Pearl Second Opinion | Overjet |
|---|---|---|
| Bitewing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Periapical | ✓ | ✓ |
| Panoramic | ✓ | ✓ |
| CBCT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Intraoral photo | ✕ | ✕ |
| Caries | ✓ | ✓ |
| Calculus | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bone loss | ✓ | ✓ |
| Periapical lesion | ✓ | ✓ |
| Restorations | ✓ | ✓ |
| Segmentation | ✕ | ✓ |
| Chairside patient view | ✓ | ✓ |
| Claim support | ✓ | ✓ |
Integrations
Only Pearl Second Opinion · 9
Both · 0
Only Overjet · 0
Choose Pearl Second Opinion if…
- Independent practices that want radiograph AI working inside the imaging software they already use
- Offices that want a visual aid for explaining findings to patients
- Practices with associates, where a consistent second read is useful
Choose Overjet if…
- DSOs and multi-location groups that want consistent diagnosis and reporting across offices
- Practices that want AI findings tied to insurance claims and verification
- Offices open to replacing their imaging software with an AI-native one
- you need segmentation
FAQ
Is Pearl Second Opinion better than Overjet?
Pearl Second Opinion leads on the overall Data Index (6.9 vs 6.2). On the 5 axes where both have evidence, Pearl Second Opinion wins 1, Overjet wins 2 and 2 are tied. Clearest gaps: integrations (Pearl Second Opinion 7.6 vs 2.3), pricing clarity (Overjet 7.0 vs 2.0), and features (Overjet 9.2 vs 8.5).
Do Pearl Second Opinion and Overjet integrate with the same systems?
They share 0 verified integrations. Only Pearl Second Opinion lists 9; only Overjet lists 0.