Practice by Numbers vs Jarvis Analytics
Verdict. Practice by Numbers leads on the overall Data Index (6.5 vs 5.7). On the 5 axes where both have evidence, Practice by Numbers wins 3, Jarvis Analytics wins 2. Clearest gaps: support (Practice by Numbers 6.0 vs 2.0), pricing clarity (Practice by Numbers 5.0 vs 2.0), and user rating (Practice by Numbers 9.8 vs 8.6). Users rate Practice by Numbers higher (4.9 vs 4.3).
Table view
| Axis | Practice by Numbers | Jarvis Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Features | no data | no data |
| Integrations | 5.9 | 6.9 |
| Pricing clarity | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| Support | 6.0 | 2.0 |
| Vendor stability | 7.3 | 8.0 |
| User rating | 9.8 | 8.6 |
Axis by axis
- Features – vs – no data
- Integrations 5.9 vs 6.9 Jarvis Analytics
- Pricing clarity 5.0 vs 2.0 Practice by Numbers
- Support 6.0 vs 2.0 Practice by Numbers
- Vendor stability 7.3 vs 8.0 Jarvis Analytics
- User rating 9.8 vs 8.6 Practice by Numbers
Practice by Numbers or Jarvis Analytics: which should you choose?
Practice by Numbers has the stronger evidence: 104 reviews at 4.9, partially public pricing and a higher support score. Jarvis Analytics has 15 reviews at 4.3, is quote-only and documents seven integrations to Practice by Numbers' five.
They share Open Dental, Dentrix and Eaglesoft. Jarvis adds Dentrix Ascend, Dentrix Enterprise, Denticon and Cloud 9 Ortho, so it matters for groups and orthodontic offices on those; Practice by Numbers adds Mango Voice and RingCentral, which matters if you want call data in the same view. Ask each for a trial on your data and compare the written quotes. See analytics ranking.
Reviewed under the standards of our Editorial Board
Side by side
| Practice by Numbers | Jarvis Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Data Index | 6.5 | 5.7 |
| Category rank | #1 of 12 · Practice analytics | #2 of 12 · Practice analytics |
| User rating | 4.9 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Review count | 104 | 15 |
| Pricing transparency | Partially public | Quote only |
| License | Subscription | Quote only |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Verified integrations | 5 | 7 |
| HIPAA claim | Yes | Yes |
| In market since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Company size | 51-200 | 1001–5000 |
| Markets | US | US, CA |
| Data completeness | 100% | 100% |
Integrations
Only Practice by Numbers · 2
Both · 3
Only Jarvis Analytics · 4
Choose Practice by Numbers if…
- user satisfaction is your priority
FAQ
Is Practice by Numbers better than Jarvis Analytics?
Practice by Numbers leads on the overall Data Index (6.5 vs 5.7). On the 5 axes where both have evidence, Practice by Numbers wins 3, Jarvis Analytics wins 2. Clearest gaps: support (Practice by Numbers 6.0 vs 2.0), pricing clarity (Practice by Numbers 5.0 vs 2.0), and user rating (Practice by Numbers 9.8 vs 8.6). Users rate Practice by Numbers higher (4.9 vs 4.3).
Do Practice by Numbers and Jarvis Analytics integrate with the same systems?
They share 3 verified integrations (Open Dental, Dentrix, and Eaglesoft). Only Practice by Numbers lists 2; only Jarvis Analytics lists 4.